Entheogens—naturally occurring psychoactive substances long used for healing, self-discovery, and spiritual insight—must be decriminalized to end persecution of those seeking personal and therapeutic benefits.
The “war on drugs” has always been, at its core, a war on human autonomy. It is a war on the mind itself—on the right of individuals to explore the depths of their own consciousness without state interference. Nowhere is this clearer than in the criminalization of entheogens, a category of substances that includes psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca, peyote, iboga, and other plant-based psychedelics. These substances have been used for thousands of years by Indigenous cultures for healing, community cohesion, and spiritual enlightenment. Their prohibition was not based on public safety, but on colonialism, racism, and fear—fear that altered states of consciousness lead people to question the status quo.
Research at Johns Hopkins University, NYU, Imperial College London, and other leading institutions has provided overwhelming evidence that entheogens are not only safe when used responsibly but also profoundly therapeutic. Johns Hopkins, which launched the first major modern study of psilocybin in the early 2000s, has since conducted numerous clinical trials showing that a single guided psilocybin session can produce long-lasting reductions in depression, anxiety, PTSD, and addiction. Their studies found that 80% of terminally ill cancer patients who took psilocybin reported a significant reduction in existential distress, with many describing their experiences as among the most meaningful of their lives. Brain imaging research at Imperial College London has shown that psychedelics like psilocybin increase neural connectivity, breaking rigid thought patterns associated with depression, trauma, and anxiety while fostering a sense of interconnectedness and well-being.
Other studies have confirmed that psilocybin can significantly help with smoking cessation, with a 2014 Johns Hopkins trial showing an 80% success rate—far higher than any pharmaceutical intervention. MDMA, though not a traditional entheogen, has demonstrated such remarkable effectiveness in treating PTSD that the FDA granted it “breakthrough therapy” status, fast-tracking research toward full legalization. The results from these studies are not subtle—they are dramatic, consistent, and deeply challenging to the outdated drug policies that have criminalized these substances for decades. The scientific consensus is clear: entheogens are not dangerous in a medical or psychological sense; rather, their prohibition is what causes harm. By blocking access to powerful healing tools, outdated laws have perpetuated suffering that could have been alleviated long ago.
Yet despite this evidence, people continue to be arrested, prosecuted, and even imprisoned for possessing or using these substances. This is not just an issue of personal freedom—it is an issue of cognitive liberty, the right to control one’s own mind and consciousness without government interference. The criminalization of entheogens is a direct assault on this fundamental right. If a person can legally dull their senses with alcohol or suppress emotions with pharmaceuticals, why should they be criminalized for seeking introspection and healing through natural substances?
Fortunately, momentum is shifting. A growing movement, led by the nonprofit Decriminalize Nature, is working to end the criminalization of entheogens city by city. Since 2019, several U.S. cities have passed measures to decriminalize psychedelic plants and fungi, including Denver, Oakland, Santa Cruz, Washington D.C., Seattle, Detroit, and San Francisco. In 2020, Oregon became the first state to legalize psilocybin therapy, paving the way for regulated use. Colorado followed suit in 2022, allowing regulated access to psilocybin and decriminalizing personal use of other natural psychedelics.
These laws don’t just prevent people from being jailed for possessing mushrooms or ceremonial cacti—they represent a fundamental shift in how society understands mental health, spirituality, and human autonomy. They acknowledge that these substances are not criminal threats but potential medicines, capable of reducing suffering and expanding human consciousness.
Opponents of decriminalization rely on outdated drug war rhetoric, claiming that entheogens will lead to social chaos, addiction, or reckless behavior. Yet the data contradicts these fears. Unlike addictive substances like opioids, cocaine, or alcohol, classic entheogens do not create physical dependence. Studies show that people who use them in intentional settings can experience increased empathy, connection, and psychological resilience. Instead of dulling the mind, these substances illuminate it—often leading people to make positive lifestyle changes, break addictive patterns, or find renewed purpose.
Criminalization, on the other hand, forces entheogen use underground, where safety and education are compromised. Instead of ensuring that people have access to trained facilitators and harm-reduction practices, prohibition drives people toward unregulated markets and potential legal consequences. This approach has never stopped people from using psychedelics—it has only ensured that they do so without proper guidance.
Decriminalization does not mean commercialization. The lessons of cannabis legalization show that corporate interests are eager to profit from previously illicit substances, often at the expense of the very communities that fought for reform. Indigenous groups, whose cultures have long safeguarded these traditions, must not be sidelined or exploited as legal markets emerge. Policies must protect access for traditional use, prevent corporate monopolization, and ensure that the benefits of decriminalization are not concentrated in the hands of the wealthy.
The real question is simple: who owns your mind? If an adult is not free to explore their own consciousness, then what freedom truly exists? Decriminalizing entheogens is not just about fixing bad drug laws—it is about asserting a fundamental right. It is about shifting from a punitive, fear-based system to one grounded in education, harm reduction, and personal choice.
Therefore, under Folklaw:
Entheogens shall be decriminalized nationwide, eliminating criminal penalties for possession, cultivation, use, gifting, and sharing. Public education on the benefits and risks of entheogens shall be expanded, and harm-reduction strategies shall replace punitive measures.
Indigenous groups shall retain full sovereignty over traditional entheogenic practices, with protections against corporate exploitation. Community-based healing models shall be prioritized over commercial markets. Cognitive liberty shall be recognized as a fundamental right, ensuring that no government may criminalize the exploration of consciousness.
Discussions
There are no discussions yet.